A survey of the clinical use of telehealth in speech - language pathology across Australia

TELEHEALTH SLP services (Hill & Theodoros, 2002; McCue, Fairman, & Pramuka, 2010). This research has explored the use of a variety of technology such as videoconferencing, telephone, videophone, email, and Skype (Mashima & Doarn, 2008; McCue et al., 2010). While the research is dominated by feasibility projects and case studies, a number of highquality randomised control trials and robust pilot studies have produced an emergent evidence base for the use of telehealth for some services (Reynolds, Vick, & Haak, 2009). It should be acknowledged that a discrepancy is evident in the literature between paediatric and adult studies, with the majority of research being undertaken with adults (Reynolds et al., 2009). A growing body of literature supports assessment via telehealth, particularly for the following groups: adult dysarthria (Hill et al., 2006; Hill, Theodoros, Russell, & Ward, 2009a), adult apraxia of speech (Hill, Theodoros, Russell, & Ward, 2009b), adult aphasia (Hill, Theodoros, Russell, Ward, & Wootton, 2008), paediatric speech, language, and literacy disorders (Waite, Theodoros, Russell, & Cahill, 2010a, b), patients postlaryngectomy (Ward et al., 2009), and the assessment and review of clients using alternative and augmentative communication (Styles, 2008). The literature around the use of telehealth in treatment services is less diverse. Two adult telehealth treatment programs found to be equivalent to traditional delivery modes are the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment program (LSVT LOUD; Constantinescu et al., 2011), and the Camperdown Programs for adults who stutter (Carey et al., 2010). The use of telehealth in the treatment of paediatric fluency disorders with the Lidcombe Program has also been examined through a well-executed phased research program using telephone and postal services (Lewis, Packman, Onslow, Simpson, & Jones, 2008; Wilson, Onslow, & Lincoln, 2004). It is interesting to note a tendency for researchers to investigate the application of treatment programs that already have established efficacy in the face-to-face environment. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to invest in high-quality telehealth research into other intervention programs if the evidence base for intervention delivered via telehealth is to become fully established. While current research literature supports telehealth as an effective service delivery model for some SLP services, the question remains as to whether it has translated into clinical practice. A survey of the use of telehealth in SLP and audiology was conducted in the United States of America by ASHA in 2002. Of the 825 SLPs who responded, 9% reported using telehealth to deliver services; however, 47% of SLPs reported an interest in using it in the future. Research into the use of telehealth technology for speech-language pathology (SLP) services has been conducted for over 30 years; however, it is unknown whether this research has translated into clinical practice. A web-based survey was deployed to determine key factors around the clinical use of telehealth by Australian SLPs. Quantitative analysis revealed that clinicians are using a wide range of technology to deliver a variety of SLP services to both paediatric and adult populations. A number of benefits to using telehealth in clinical practice were identified, along with significant barriers to the expansion of telehealth in SLP. Suggested facilitators for the further development of telehealth in SLP included more professional development in the area of telehealth, demonstrations by experienced users of telehealth, and access to electronic assessment and treatment resources. Limitations of the study are discussed with directions for future research.